[Odonata-l] [SoWestOdes] annual odonate surveys
Steve & Marcia M. Hummel
mshummel at netins.net
Tue Nov 7 09:16:52 PST 2006
Hi all,
This is a bit off subject, but I felt I needed to reply to the
education comments of Chris's. It isn't just AZ, but probably most
states where abadonment of field biology has happened. The rise of
molecular biology and its stressing in state (or in IA) and local
standards, as well as no child left behind, is very much to blame.
Additionally, many administrators don't understand the value of
nature study. I spent 25 years teaching high school science and found
it difficult to get permission to take the students out of the
classroom. I did finally get to establish an environmental science
class and made the first quarter of the school year based on an insect
collection connected to later study of biodiversity. 4 years ago my
position with the school was cut due to declining enrollment and the
environmental science class was dropped.
I've worked as a county naturalist for the last 3.5 years doing
environmental education. I try to get kids (I'm working with
pre-school through high school) outside as much as possible. The
kids, of course, love it, but we have to be rather creative to connect
what we are doing to "standards". My personal feelings is that the
narrow standards and NCLB is nearly criminal in what they have done to
the study of the natural world and the consequent lack of
understanding and appreciation in the younger population of this
country.
Everyone that is interested in nature should be contacting school
administrators and science teachers expressing their concern about
nature study not being an important part of the curriculum.
We need many more young people to have an interest in the natural
world (and drogonflies, butterflies, etc) and this needs to be started
in school if they aren't getting it elsewhere.
Thanks,
Steve Hummel
Lake View, IA
DSA board member
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:04:51 -0800 (PST)
chris kline <kline_at_pine at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Dennis and others,
>
> Seems like (in AZ at least) the ode people aren't quite as well
>organized as the lep people, or maybe there just aren't as many of
>us.
>
> Here at Boyce Thompson Arboretum (Superior, AZ) we do a monthly
>dragonfly walk from May thru October. With that, we are able to keep
>track of what we have flying here locally plus make an attempt to try
>to get other folks jazzed about odes.
>
> In the near future I am wanting to structure our dragonfly program
>a hair differently, to create more of a "citizen science" atmosphere
>with the program, and hopefully encourage our participants to travel
>throughout AZ looking for odes.
>
> Something that Rich Bailowitz and I have discussed from time to
>time is how to get new, young people more involved in looking for
>odes (and other creatures too). I'm sounding like a crusty old
>flatulant here (all of 43!). Seems like with the advent of "state
>standards" and their focus on the molecular level of biology (at
>least in Arizona public schools), there has been a virtual
>abandonment of field biology.
>
> I think all of these tangents relate to your question of whether
>other states are tracking their odes.
>
> chris
>
More information about the Odonata-l
mailing list